Search PMN  

PDF version
for printing



 


© 2006 Plant Management Network.
Accepted for publication 30 January 2006. Published 23 March 2006.


Potassium Supply Rate as Measured by Exchange Membranes in a Calcareous Sand


Micah S. Woods and Frank S. Rossi, Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, 134A Plant Science, Ithaca, NY, 14853; and Quirine M. Ketterings, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, 817 Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853


Corresponding author: Micah S. Woods. msw43@cornell.edu


Woods, M. S., Rossi, F. S., and Ketterings, Q. M. 2006. Potassium supply rate as measured by exchange membranes in a calcareous sand. Online. Applied Turfgrass Science doi:10.1094/ATS-2006-0323-01-RS.


Abstract

Cation exchange membranes [Plant Root Simulator (PRS) probes] were used to evaluate the K supply rate of a calcareous sand putting green. Creeping bentgrass [Agrostis stolonifera var. palustris (Huds.) Farw.] leaf K content was used as an indicator of K bioavailability. On all 14 measurement dates in 2002 and 2003, the K supply rate increased in experimental plots to which K fertilizer had been applied. On 9 of the 12 dates when leaf samples were collected, K content in leaf samples increased with K supply rate. We conclude that K supply rate is a meaningful indicator of K bioavailability, and exchange membranes offer potential for assessment of in situ variability in K supply. However, the sensitivity of the exchange membranes to changes in soil K supply over time presents obstacles to simple interpretation of supply rate measurements.


Introduction

The K status of sand rootzones is usually assessed by soil nutrient analyses. These rapid tests measure the K removed from a dried soil sample by an extracting solution such as Mehlich 3, ammonium acetate, or sodium acetate (1). Ideally, a local research database would be available to link the quantity of K extracted to a turfgrass growth or quality response. From that database, one could develop a system for classifying sites as low, medium, or high in K, and a fertilizer program could be based on such classifications. However, very few studies have evaluated turfgrass growth or quality in response to extractable soil K across a range of soil types.

A number of recent studies have found no response of creeping bentgrass to applied K, even in sand rootzones that were classified as low in extractable K (3,5,6,10,17). These results indicate that additional research is needed to better understand creeping bentgrass requirements for K in sand rootzones. In calcareous rootzones, where plant-available K can be depressed because of the high Ca2+:K+ ratio of the soil solution (11), the interpretation of soil test results can be further complicated. Diffusion is the primary mechanism of K movement to the root surface (9). Nutrient analyses of dried soil measure only a mass of K, but ion exchange membranes can be used to measure K+ flux in the rootzone. This flux is termed an "ion supply rate" and represents the quantity of ions adsorbed by a fixed surface area of exchange membrane over a known time. We use the terms "K supply rate" and "K supply" in this paper to mean the supply of K to a cation exchange membrane. Conventional soil nutrient analyses do not measure K diffusion; the understanding of K fertilizer requirements in sand rootzones might be improved by consideration of testing methods that measure K diffusion in the soil.

Ion exchange membranes have been used to assess ammonium, nitrate, and phosphate leaching from turfgrass sites (4) and nitrate availability to turfgrass (7,8). Exchange membranes can be used under field or laboratory conditions, and the multifarious uses of these materials in agricultural and environmental research have been reviewed in two thorough papers (13,14). Cation exchange membranes have been used to assess K supply to agronomic crops, but we are not aware of their use in anthropogenic sand rootzones or in turfgrass systems in general.

We investigated the use of ion exchange membranes for the measurement of plant-available K in a calcareous sand rootzone. Creeping bentgrass leaf K content was used as an indicator of K bioavailability. Our objectives were to measure the K supply rate in a creeping bentgrass putting green fertilized with K at different rates, and to evaluate the feasibility of ion exchange membranes as a tool for assessing soil K bioavailability in turfgrass systems.


Potassium Applications

Twenty-four rectangular plots (91 cm by 328 cm) were laid out on an L-93 creeping bentgrass research putting green (pH 8.3) at the Cornell University Turfgrass and Landscape Research and Education Center in Ithaca, NY. A detailed description of the chemical and physical properties of this sand can be found in Woods et al. (16). The 1 M ammonium acetate extractable K in June 2002 was 36 mg/kg, which is classified as low (1).

Six rates of K fertilizer were applied as treatments in a completely randomized design with four replications of each treatment. Potassium fertilizer was applied to the plots as K2SO4 at 6 rates (0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 g of K per m2) at 14-day intervals during the 2002 and 2003 growing seasons. All K applications were made with a CO2-pressurized sprayer (R&D Sprayers, Opelousas, LA) calibrated to deliver 167 ml solution m2 at 345 kPa. Thirteen applications were made in 2002 from 5 June to 19 November; twelve applications in 2003 were sprayed from 2 June to 1 November. Nitrogen was applied equally to each plot (19 g/m2 in 2002, and 14 g/m2 in 2003), as was P (3 g of P per m2 per year). No other fertilizers were applied over the course of the study, and growth regulators were not used; chlorothalonil was applied as a curative treatment for dollar spot (Sclerotinia homeocarpa F. T. Bennett).

Cation exchange membranes [Plant Root Simulator (PRS)-probe, Western Ag Innovations, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada] were used for measurements of soil K supply rate every 28 days from June to November each year. Measurements were initiated 13 days after the previous K fertilizer application, except for additional measurements made on 4 June 2002, 25 March 2003, and 1 June 2003. The PRS-probes and method of insertion are shown in Fig. 1. Briefly, PRS-probes were inserted vertically in the putting green, with the membrane surface in contact with the rootzone from 2.5 to 7.5 cm in depth. One PRS-probe was placed at a random location in each of the 24 plots. After 24 hours of insertion, the probes were removed from the rootzone and any adjoined soil was washed off with deionized water. Adsorbed cations were removed from the membrane with 0.5 M HCl and were measured in the eluate by inductively-coupled plasma spectrometry (ICP). After elution, the probes were saturated with Na+ from NaHCO3 and re-used. Because the probes have a fixed surface area and were inserted in the soil for a specific time, the units of ions adsorbed to the membranes are reported as µg K per cm2 per 24 h. Predictive relationships between K supply rate and leaf K content were calculated using the REG procedure in SAS STAT software (version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).



 

 

Fig. 1. In frame A, one PRS-probe (Western Ag Innovations, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada) is shown with a U.S. 25-cent piece and a Unibest resin bag (Unibest Intl. Corp, Pasco, WA) for size comparison. A spade was used to make a vertical slit in the green, as shown in frame B. The PRS-probe was placed into the slit (frame C), and soil contact with the probe was ensured by applying pressure through the foot around the probe, closing the slit. The probe was left in the soil for 24 h (frame D), and upon removal the adsorbed cations were eluted and quantified.



Potassium Supply Rates Increase with Potassium Application

The 24-h K supply rate was measured on 15 occasions from June 2002 to November 2003. The first measurement in 2002 was prior to any K applications, and the supply rates were equal in all plots. On each of the 14 subsequent measuring dates, the PRS-probes measured an increase in K supply rate in the plots to which K fertilizer had been applied (Fig. 2). Statistical differences were evaluated using linear mixed models fit to these repeated measures data using the MIXED procedure in SAS STAT software. Although the K fertilizer rate was constant at each application date, the K supply rates fluctuated from one measurement date to the next. These fluctuations capture the variability in K supply over time as it is affected by solution K+ activity, leaching, soil temperature, soil water content, root uptake of K, release of K from mineral forms in the soil, and other contributing factors. Potassium supply rate increased during June and July of 2002, but the supply rate plummeted by mid-August after a series of heavy irrigation events had occurred at the test site. The K supply rate increased again in the fall of 2002, and differences in supply rate continued into March and June of 2003, more than 4 and 6 months respectively after the previous K fertilizer application. In this sand, with a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of just 1.2 cmolc/kg, we had not expected that K applied in 2002 would influence the K supply rates in the following year. The K supply rates measured in August and October of 2003 were larger than at any other dates in this study. Although measurements of soil moisture, temperature, and weather conditions were made during the time of probe insertion, these data did not explain the variations we observed in K supply rate. We believe that the measured K supply rates represent the intensity of K supply to the roots during the insertion time.


 

Fig. 2. The K supply rate as measured on a calcareous sand creeping bentgrass putting green at Ithaca, NY, in 2002 and 2003. Supply rates are shown individually for each of the K fertilizer treatments.

 

The K supply rates in individual plots receiving no additional K ranged from 0.8 to 7.9 µg of K per cm2 per 24 h with a mean baseline K supply rate of 3.1 µg of K per cm2 per 24 h (standard deviation = 1.7, n = 60). These rates represent the baseline K supply for this calcareous sand rootzone. In both 2002 and 2003, the baseline K supply rate decreased from June to November. However, the mean baseline K supply rate in 2003 was the same as in 2002 (Fig. 2), suggesting that K fertilizer is not always the preponderant source of bioavailable K. Dest and Guillard (3) have shown that creeping bentgrass may not respond to K fertilizer in sands with sufficient nonexchangeable K, and investigations of extractable K at this site suggest that nonexchangeable K in the sand may be a source of plant-available K in the absence of K fertilizer (17).


Leaf K Content Increases with Greater K Supply Rate

When K fertilizer had been applied 13 days prior to K supply rate measurement, there was a consequent increase in leaf tissue K content with greater K supply. This effect was detected on 9 of 12 sampling dates. Representative relationships are shown in Fig. 3. For the 9 sampling dates when there was an observed increase in leaf K content with K supply rate, the coefficients of determination ranged from 0.20 to 0.60. The leaf tissue K content varied over time, most likely because of environmental conditions, soil K supply, and leaf water content (15). Therefore, the leaf K content, although at any one date related to soil K supply, could not be predicted based on K supply rate (Fig. 3). This result is in agreement with previous work (16) that showed creeping bentgrass leaf K content varied across time at equivalent levels of extractable soil K.


 

Fig. 3. Representative relationships between K supply rate and creeping bentgrass leaf K content on 3 dates in 2003 at Ithaca, NY.

 

A Feasible Method of Measuring K?

On a golf course, ion exchange membranes must be used in such a way that they do not interfere with maintenance practices or golf play. We inserted the probes vertically, and approximately 3 cm of the probe assembly was above the turf surface. The PRS-probe could be inserted into the soil at a 45° angle, and this would keep the membrane within the 10-cm rootzone and allow for complete insertion of the probe into the soil. Alternatively, membranes can be manually placed in the soil, or other frame designs could be developed specifically for turfgrass systems, where an extended handle on the probe is not desirable.

Although the potential interference of exchange membranes with turfgrass maintenance and sports play are easily overcome, a more intractable argument against their use is that the ion supply rate data are difficult to interpret. The PRS-probes were sensitive to K fertilizer-induced changes in the rootzone, and 24-h K supply rate was an acceptable measure of bioavailable K, as indicated by the positive relationship between K supply rate and leaf K content on individual sampling dates. However, variability among sampling dates makes it difficult to interpret the data for K fertility management over longer periods. Paradoxically, the very precision with which the membranes measured K supply rate in the rootzone resulted in data that were difficult to classify as low, medium, or high. Conventional soil testing methods for K in sand rootzones are also difficult to interpret (16), but the extracted K for a particular method and K fertilizer rate appears to be less variable (17) than does the K supply rate at a given K fertilizer rate.

There are some intriguing uses of ion exchange membranes that remain to be investigated in turfgrass systems. Exchange membranes can be used for rapid (1 h) assessment of K supply rate (12), or be left in the soil for hours, days, or even weeks (13,14). Longer-term insertion of exchange membranes captures not only the immediate nutrient supply, but also diffusion and release of K from mineral or non-exchangeable forms. If exchange membranes come into equilibrium with the surrounding solution, and no longer serve primarily as a sink, the membrane acts as a dynamic exchanger (2), and the ions adsorbed to the membrane in that situation represent the ions as they are affected by perturbations to the soil solution. As such, the use of exchange membranes to assess the diffusion and release of K from non-exchangeable forms in sand rootzones may help to explain the response or lack of response to K fertilizer at a particular site.

Although it remains difficult to interpret K supply rates on turfgrass sites today, the ability of exchange membranes to capture the in situ variability in soil K supply may offer insights into a better understanding of K nutrition in turfgrass sand rootzones.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank Maria Derval Diaz for her assistance in the measurements of K supply rate.


Literature Cited

1. Carrow, R. N., Stowell, L., Gelernter, W., Davis, S., Duncan, R. R., and Skorulski, J. 2004. Clarifying soil testing: III. SLAN sufficiency ranges and recommendations. Golf Course Manage. 72:194-198.

2. Cooperband, L. R., and Logan, T. J. 1994. Measuring in situ changes is labile soil phosphorus with anion-exchange membranes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:105-114.

3. Dest, W. M., and Guillard, K. 2001. Bentgrass response to K fertilization and K release rates from eight sand rootzone sources used in putting green construction. Int. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9:375-381.

4. Easton, Z. M., and Petrovic, A. M. 2004. Fertilizer source effect on ground and surface water quality in drainage from turfgrass. J. Environ. Qual. 33:645-655.

5. Fulton, M. 2002. Creeping bentgrass responses to long-term applications of nutrients. Golf Course Manage. 70:62-65.

6. Johnson, P. G., Koenig, R. T., and Kopp, K. L. 2003. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium responses and requirements in calcareous sand greens. Agron. J. 95:697-702.

7. Kopp, K. L., and Guillard, K. 2002. Relationship of turfgrass growth and quality to soil nitrate desorbed from anion exchange membranes. Crop Sci. 42:1232-1240.

8. Mangiafico, S. S., and Guillard, K. 2005. Turfgrass reflectance measurements, chlorophyll, and soil nitrate desorbed from anion exchange membranes. Crop Sci. 45:259-265.

9. Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd Ed. Academic Press, San Diego.

10. Nikolai, T. A. 2002. Effects of rolling and fertility on putting green root zone mixes. PhD. diss. (Diss. abstr. AAI3064284), Mich. State Univ., East Lansing.

11. Peech, M., and Bradfield, R. 1943. The effect of lime and magnesia on the soil potassium and on the absorption of potassium by plants. Soil Sci. 55:37-48.

12. Qian, P., Schoenau, J. J., Greer, K. J., and Liu, Z. 1996. Assessing plant-available potassium in soil using cation exchange membrane burial. Can. J. Soil Sci. 76:191-194.

13. Qian, P., and Schoenau, J. J. 2002. Practical applications of ion exchange resins in agricultural and environmental soil research. Can. J. Soil Sci. 82:9-21.

14. Skogley, E. O., and Dobermann, A. 1996. Synthetic ion-exchange resins: soil and environmental studies. J. Environ. Qual. 25:13-24.

15. Woods, M. S., Rossi, F. S., and Ketterings, Q. M. 2005. Potassium content of turfgrass leaves expressed on a tissue water basis. 2005 Agronomy Abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI.

16. Woods, M. S., Ketterings, Q. M., and Rossi, F. S. 2005. Effectiveness of standard soil tests for assessing potassium availability in sand rootzones. Soil Sci. 170:110-119.

17. Woods, M. S., Ketterings, Q. M., and Rossi, F. S. 2006. Potassium availability indices and turfgrass performance in a calcareous sand putting green. Crop Sci. 46:381-389.